Dr. Ameen, ENT Specialist in Kuala Lumpur

Compassionate Care for Your Ear, Nose & Throat

Ear, Nose & Throat Specialist (Adult & Paediatric)
Pakar Hidung, Telinga & Tekak (Dewasa & Kanak2)


🎓Qualifications
🩺MB BCh BAO Hons (Ireland🍀)
🔪Master (DrP) in Otorhinolaryngology (ENT👂👃👄), Head & Neck Surgery (UKM, Malaysia🌺)


Email: drameenpakarent@protonmail.com

UV sterilisation for ENT scopes :)

Penggunaan UV untuk membersihkan permukaan barang/alat sudah biasa di lihat. Kali ini, saya ingin mengajak anda semua untuk memahami dengan lebih lanjut tentang kaedah sterilization alat-alat scope ENT menggunakan UV light 🙂

Abstract

Objective

To compare the effectiveness of disinfection protocols utilizing a ultraviolet (UV) Smart D60 light system with Impelux™ technology with a standard Cidex ortho-phthalaldehyde (OPA) disinfection protocol for cleaning flexible fiberoptic laryngoscopes (FFLs).

Methods

Two hundred FFLs were tested for bacterial contamination after routine use, and another 200 FFLs were tested after disinfection with one of four methods: enzymatic detergent plus Cidex OPA (standard), enzymatic detergent plus UV Smart D60, microfiber cloth plus UV Smart D60, and nonsterile wipe plus UV Smart D60. Pre- and post-disinfection microbial burden levels and positive culture rates were compared using Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA and Fisher’s two-sided exact, respectively.

Results

After routine use, approximately 56% (112/200) of FFLs were contaminated, with an average contamination level of 9,973.7 ± 70,136.3 CFU/mL. The standard reprocessing method showed no positive cultures. The enzymatic plus UV, microfiber plus UV, and nonsterile wipe plus UV methods yielded contamination rates of 4% (2/50), 6% (3/50), and 12% (6/50), respectively, with no significant differences among the treatment groups (p > 0.05). The pre-disinfection microbial burden levels decreased significantly after each disinfection technique (p < 0.001). The average microbial burden recovered after enzymatic plus UV, microfiber plus UV, and nonsterile wipe plus UV were 0.40 CFU/mL ± 2, 0.60 CFU/mL ± 2.4, and 12.2 CFU/mL ± 69.5, respectively, with no significant difference among the treatment groups (p > 0.05). Micrococcus species (53.8%) were most frequently isolated, and no high-concern organisms were recovered.

Conclusion

Disinfection protocols utilizing UV Smart D60 were as effective as the standard chemical disinfection protocol using Cidex OPA.

UV Smart D60 sterilisation

Leave a comment

I’m Dr Ameen, an ENT specialist based in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia

I am passionate about helping people breathe, hear, and live better. After years of experience at Hospital Kuala Lumpur and Tunku Azizah Women and Children Hospital, I now provide specialised care at Sunway Medical Centre Velocity, Columbia Hospital Setapak, and Klinik ANDA Wangsa Melawati. Through this page, I share simple, reliable tips and insights to help you understand and manage common ear, nose, and throat conditions with confidence.

MY CLINIC HOURS:

  • TUESDAY – 8pm to 10pm (Klinik ANDA Wangsa Melawati)
  • FRIDAY – 9am to 5pm (Sunway Medical Centre Velocity)
  • FRIDAY – 5pm to 8pm (Columbia Asia Hospital Setapak)
  • SATURDAY – 9am to 1pm (Sunway Medical Centre Velocity)
Book your appointment to see me at Sunway Medical Centre Velocity by clicking HERE
Book your appointment to see me at Columbia Hospital Setapak by clicking HERE